III)     Inside the version of your father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second Model) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed towards the petitioner and others was simple presence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.

14. From the light from the position explained previously mentioned, it's concluded that a civil servant contains a fundamental right to generally be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be regarded as for no fault of his own and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency during the size of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, even though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it can be actually rather obscure about whether the 90-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based within the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held into the 90-working day notice need, and rules in Stacy’s favor.

competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)

94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. Should the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the ninety times for your department to act has already expired. About the aforesaid proposition, we are guided with the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.

This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it proper for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified because of the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar challenge. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in implementing the law. This example of case legislation refers to two cases listened to during the state court, with the same level.

P.C. Liability of petitioners for the stated offences would be determined through the uncovered trial Court after sifting the evidentiary value with the material manufactured before the same. Till then, case of

This public interest litigation came before here the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a close-by electricity grid station on account of likely health risks and hazards.

If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only completed In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and the petitioner company responded to the allegations as a result they were well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling over the same form of case.

                                                        

It is additionally important to note that granting of seniority to a civil servant without the actual size of service just about violates the entire service structure being a civil servant inducted in Grade 17 by claiming these kinds of benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher quality, which is neither the intention of the regulation nor of the equity. Read more